Upload a Photo Upload a Video Add a News article Write a Blog Add a Comment
Blog Feed News Feed Video Feed All Feeds

Folders

 

 

DIII Indoor TF Rankings — Week 5, February 22 - USTFCCCA

Published by
Coach Matthew Barreau   Feb 22nd 2012, 4:59pm
Comments

DIII Indoor T&F Rankings — Week 5, February 22

Courtesy: Tom Lewis, USTFCCCA

February 22, 2012 

QUICKLY … The men of North Central (Ill.) and the women of Wartburg retained their No. 1 national-ranking for the sixth-straight week as most of Division III readies for conference indoor meets. UW-La Crosse’s men moved back to No. 2 from No. 3, flipping places with WIAC rival UW-Oshkosh. St. Thomas (Minn.) makes their first appearance in the men’s top five. Williams’ women came back to No. 3 after spending a week at No. 5.

National Ranking PDFs: Top 25 | Full by Team | Event-by-Event | Week-by-Week
Regional Index PDFs: Top Ten by Region | Full by Team | Event-by-Event
Collegiate-Leading Marks | Best Marks by Football Players
Previous Rankings

 

USTFCCCA



NCAA Division III



Men's Indoor Track & Field National Team Computer Rankings (Top 25)

2012 Week #5 -- February 22



next ranking: February 29









Rank

School

Points

Conference

Head Coach (Yr)

Last Week

1

North Central (Ill.)

141.84

CCIW

Frank Gramarosso (2nd)

1

2

UW-La Crosse

136.48

WIAC

Josh Buchholtz (4th)

3

3

UW-Oshkosh

120.81

WIAC

Paul Brown (2nd)

2

4

UW-Whitewater

72.31

WIAC

Mike Johnson (3rd)

4

5

St. Thomas (Minn.)

71.99

MIAC

Steve Mathre (17th)

8

6

McMurry

69.67

ASC

Barbara Crousen (14th)

5

7

UW-Eau Claire

69.14

WIAC

Chip Schneider (10th)

6

8

Nebraska Wesleyan

67.28

Great Plains

Ted Bulling (27th)

15

9

Wabash

62.98

NCAC

Clyde Morgan (4th)

10

10

UW-Stout

62.38

WIAC

Laura Knudsen (4th)

11

11

UW-Platteville

61.37

WIAC

Jim Nickasch (11th)

7

12

Amherst

60.01

NESCAC

Ned Nedeau (15th)

14

13

SUNY Geneseo

56.75

SUNYAC

Dave Prevosti (8th)

9

14

Bates

48.06

NESCAC

Al Fereshetian (17th)

17

15

MIT

43.66

NEWMAC

Halston Taylor (22nd)

12

16

Methodist

41.57

USA South

Duane Ross (5th)

16

17

Baldwin-Wallace

41.29

OAC

Bill Taraschke (27th)

20

18

Christopher Newport

39.89

USA South

Tyler Wingard (6th)

19

19

Haverford

39.84

Centennial

Tom Donnelly (37th)

13

20

UMass Dartmouth

38.86

Little East

Steve Gardiner (4th)

18

21

UW-River Falls

35.38

WIAC

Aaron Decker (2nd)

24

22

Wartburg

35.17

IIAC

Marcus Newsom (14th)

23

23

Middlebury

33.90

NESCAC

Martin Beatty (24th)

21

24

Springfield (Mass.)

32.51

NEWMAC

Ken Klatka (35th)

22

25

UW-Stevens Point

29.35

WIAC

Rick Witt (33rd)

42

dropped out: No. 25 Illinois College







Men's Conference Index Top 10



Rank

Conference

Points

Top 25 Teams



1

WIAC

587.23

8



2

NESCAC

217.98

3



3

CCIW

169.86

1



4

SUNYAC

110.24

1



5

MIAC

109.43

1



6

OAC

106.22

1



7

NCAC

97.34

1



8

NEWMAC

84.31

2



9

USA South

81.46

2



10

UAA

76.14










 

 

USTFCCCA NCAA Division III

Women’s Indoor Track & Field National Team Computer Rankings (Top 25)

2012 Week #5 — February 22

next ranking: February 29

Rank School Points Conference Head Coach (Yr) Last Week
1 Wartburg 253.43 IIAC Marcus Newsom (14th) 1
2 UW-Oshkosh 159.41 WIAC Pat Ebel (3rd) 2
3 Williams 90.94 NESCAC Fletcher Brooks (4th) 5
4 MIT 86.47 NEWMAC Halston Taylor (5th) 3
5 Washington (Mo.) 84.48 UAA Jeff Stiles (11th) 4
6 Middlebury 68.41 NESCAC Martin Beatty (24th) 14
7 Ithaca 62.21 Empire 8 Jennifer Potter (9th) 9
8 Methodist 60.30 USA South Duane Ross (5th) 6
9 UW-Whitewater 59.45 WIAC Mike Johnson (1st) 8
10 Buffalo State 56.13 SUNYAC Eugene Lewis (12th) 10
11 Illinois Wesleyan 55.74 CCIW Chris Schumacher (15th) 7
12 Lehman 51.02 CUNYAC Lesleigh Hogg (16th) 16
13 Illinois College 45.84 Midwest Mike Brooks (11th) 11
14 Monmouth (Ill.) 44.63 Midwest Roger Haynes (12th) 12
15 Ramapo 36.83 NJAC Mike Jackson (8th) 13
16 SUNY Oneonta 35.72 SUNYAC Matt LoPiccolo (8th) 15
17 UW-La Crosse 35.05 WIAC Pat Healy (21st) 23
18 Nebraska Wesleyan 33.66 Great Plains Ted Bulling (25th) 19
19 Wheaton (Mass.) 32.19 NEWMAC Dave Cusano (1st) 18
20 Franklin & Marshall 32.04 Centennial Carl Schnabel (9th) 17
21 Tufts 31.11 NESCAC Kristen Morwick (12th) 33
22 Bowdoin 29.92 NESCAC Peter Slovenski (26th) 20
23 Coe 29.20 IIAC Michael Warta (5th) 30
24 Mount Union 28.52 OAC Kevin Lucas (2nd) 21
25 Linfield 26.58 Northwest Travis Olson (2nd) 29
dropped out: No. 22 Birmingham-Southern, No. 24 McMurry, No. 25 Marietta

 

Women’s Conference Index Top 10
Rank Conference Points Top 25 Teams
1 WIAC 330.14 3
2 IIAC 299.26 2
3 NESCAC 253.01 4
4 NEWMAC 140.59 2
5 UAA 129.99 1
6 SUNYAC 115.64 2
7 Midwest Conference 97.57 2
8 CCIW 93.27 1
9 USA South 81.28 1
10 OAC 80.33 1

 

 

About the Rankings
For more on the national team rankings and links to guideline and rationale information visit …
http://www.ustfccca.org/rankings/division-iii-rankings

Rankings are determined by a mathematical formula, which is based on current national descending order lists. This is what’s used to compile a team’s ranking. The purpose and methodology of the rankings is to create an index that showcases the teams that have the best potential of achieving the top spots in the national-title race.

The Regional Index is determined using a similar method as national rankings, but on a smaller scale, comparing teams versus others within the same region. The result is a ranking that showcases squads with better all-around team potential — a group makeup critical for conference or similar team-scored events. A team may achieve a better regional ranking than a counterpart that has a better national ranking. Historically, some teams are better national-championship teams than conference-championship teams, having a few elite athletes that score very well in a diverse environment where teams do not have entries in more than a few events. Some teams are better at conference championships or similar team-scored events where they enter, and are competitive, in many of the events.

How a team fares in a national championship, conference championship, or scored meet with only a couple or few teams (like a dual or triangular) can be very different, given the number of events, competition, scoring, and makeup of entries — thus the rationale behind each of the ranking systems. Similar arguments about team makeup and rankings can also be found in swimming & diving and wrestling as their sports also have a similar trichotomy when it comes to team theory.



Read the full article at: www.ustfccca.org

More news

History for Christopher Newport University Track and Field and Cross Country - Newport News, Virginia
YearVideosNewsPhotosBlogs
2023   63    
2022 1 78    
2021   71    
Show 13 more
 
+PLUS highlights
+PLUS coverage
Live Events
Get +PLUS!